Trial History and Memory free essay sample

Film The Queen and Tanka Luckins novel The Gates of Memory consciously represent aspects of history and memory to give the responder a deeper understanding of the events in the texts. The events being the death of Princess Diana in 1997 and the 75th anniversary of the end of the Great War in 1993. Both composers had a purpose of their texts in which they wanted to portray to their audiences. Stephen Frears being to give audiences an insight into the private life of the Royal Family, whilst Luckins wanted to explore the concept of memory and loss in the Great War.Stephen Frears attempt to portray into a behind the scenes look into the royal family related to the interplay of both personal and public life. We are immediately introduced to the Queen through a tilt shot go her being painted, note that the camera angle when on the Queen is almost all of the time above her head, this is symbolic into two representations, one, the Queen is viewed as the figure head of the nation 2 we gain a god like perspective of the Queen reflecting the natural hierarchy. We will write a custom essay sample on Trial History and Memory or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This shot of the Queen shows her very traditionally dressed as a reflection of her traditional values and the monarchy, a long shot of the Queen with the cape draped around her reflects her private nature however Frears is giving us an inside into this hidden aspect, at the same time Tony Blair is being interviewed on T. V. about becoming Prime Minister, note that the two modes being used juxtaposed the traditional values of the Queen that of the modern government.The music used us often always classical reflecting the reserved nature of the Queen. Frears has viewed a mixture of archival footage, created archival footage and filmed moments to enhance the realistic nature of the event in the aim of the Audience believing it. The use of archival footage, news and interviews allows the viewer to view the public aspect and public reaction to the death of Princess Diana. The created archival footage with the grainy filter, of news interviews with Tony Blair convinces the audience that he is the realTony Blair and enhances their understanding . It is important to note that never do we actually see any footage of Diana that is not real, she never appears as an actor in the film, albeit the moment she is killed. Frears here is attempting in this shot to emphasis the intrusion on her life by the Papparzzi as th e shot is from over her shoulders. The montage here allows the composer to place images in a sequence juxtaposing the one in which it is placed next to.This cleverly gives us short representation of her life and how she was always chased by the Papparazi. The image in the montage where Diana is in the waves is symbolic of the waves of the media over her life, or her isolation having left the royal family. The camera shot showing her defensively looking over her shoulder, The recurring motif of water is also seen when the Queen gets stuck in the river symbolic of her relationship with the public.The film is shot from over her shoulder and the footage is grainy suggesting that this moments too private even for us as the viewer to see. The representation with the flowers and the queens physical distance of the people reflect her distant relationship with the people, and how little she understands the people okay just move the flowers away However frears attempts to portray this is how the Queen has been raised, brought up with traditional values.Charles says She grew up in the war time This is further emphasised when Charles says Why dont you get a new car and the Queen replies This perfectly alright The distance kept here between the window screen and them is emphatic yet again of their private nature. The panning shot of the landscape is pathetic fallacy using the cold, bare, distant plains as symbolism of the royal family and the stag in which they hunt a symbol of Diana. Similarly The Gates of Memory speaks of personal aspects in which create memory such as that of Diaries, photographs, letters, oral memories, ocuments etc. all of which take away the cruel purgatory of waiting quotes Luckins. This also explores the idea of how Keating a public figure spoke very little of the bet roved relatives but of what Australia has constituted and gained from the common men' Australia is often referred to as a metaphor mentions luckins The arrival of captain cook is seen as the birth of Australia/ the maturity phase, where as loss and death does not constitute as part of the growth model and is often referred to as the Great Australian Silence.In conclusion both Stephen Frears and Tanja Luckins have used their novel and film to give the responder a deeper understanding to events and people in the text through the use of diabetic and non diabetic sound, visual techniques and literary techniques. The events are shapes and represented as the responder wants to view it in the case of the queen believable actors, costumes and props made this achievable.

Personal Ethic Statement free essay sample

VirtuePersonal Ethics Statement Personal ethics provides a foundation for an individuals’ moral scale. It reflects personal beliefs on values, morals, right, and wrong. Personal ethics is influenced by family, friends, community, religion, culture, and coworkers; and that can have a positive or negative impact. Personal ethics varies from person to person; some points may be similar whereas others will differ. Personal ethics drives actions, and to some point, emotions day by day. Depending, on the individual our personal ethics and where we stand will lead us on a path of failure or success. According to my Ethical Lens Inventory, my preferred ethical lens is Rights- Responsibility and Results Lens (Ethical Lens Inventory Games), meaning that I can think rationally and still be emotionally balanced while coming up with a solution for the greater good of the people. I value independence and individual rights while making sure everyone is treated fairly. I am optimistic and like to bring new ideas to the table that someone may not have seen before. We will write a custom essay sample on Personal Ethic Statement or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page My blind spot is â€Å"Belief that motives justify methods or your own good is good† (Ethical Lens Inventory Games). Sometimes I let people down who are depending on me. I can ignore other problems as long as mines are solved. My strengths are â€Å"Self Knowledge and Free will† (Ethical Lens Inventory Games) I believe in balancing responsibility and entrepreneurship. I believe everyone should be accountable and self-reliant because I am so I expect that from others. My weakness is once I have made up my mind about something that I can close the door on other interpretation. I also have to accept that I cannot do everything by myself and that if I do not take the time to reflect that I can fail and become exhausted. My values are Autonomy, Rationality, Sensibility, Temperance, and Prudence (Ethical Lens Inventory Games). As a result of my personal background and what I have learned, I have placed prominence on being independent but also accepting help from others. My course of action is taking and accepting responsibility for my own actions. I have high expectations and my actions will determine my level of success. I will take time out to reflect on who I am, who I want to become and how I am going to get there. I am going to do what is right and in my heart. I will not change who I am for others even if they dislike me. I will follow the golden rule and treat people how I want to be treated. I will be fair to others and avoid being biased. I will fulfill my duties for those counting on me, and be respectful and show dignity for myself and for others. I will never settle for less and try my hardest at everything that I do, and seek continued improvement. References Ethics Games. Ethical Lens Inventory Report. Retrieved from http://www. ethicsgames. com

Aristotle vs. Hobbes Equality Essay Essay Example

Aristotle vs. Hobbes: Equality Essay Paper Aristotle vs. Hobbes. constitutes a argument between two great minds from two deeply different periods of clip. Whereas Aristotle ( 384 – 322 BCE ) had been a portion of the Greek’s and more exactly. Athens’s Golden Age. Thomas Hobbes ( 1588 – 1679 ) had lived through the English Civil War of 1640s to go one of the most influential philosophers. Based on their ain personal experiences and milieus. both Aristotle and Hobbes had developed a position of what human equality should prolong. However. Hobbes’ apprehension of natural equality is preferred. as he provides society with the excess room for equality and chance that the topics of a good crowned head would see to be available to them. in comparing to Aristotle’s hierarchal division of people into natural higher-ups. inferiors and slaves. who are given really limited accomplishments and chances. Aristotle’s thought of equality would hold applied to all citizens who participate in the political life of the city state in which they live. We will write a custom essay sample on Aristotle vs. Hobbes: Equality Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Aristotle vs. Hobbes: Equality Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Aristotle vs. Hobbes: Equality Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer By making so. they would hold acquired the human virtuousnesss and excellences. every bit good as achieve their natural telos as a â€Å"political animal† ( Aristotle. p. 4 ) . Merely within a city state. citizens are able to take part and heighten their political and practical ground. therefore reach their human telos. As such. the city state is â€Å"among the things that exist by nature† ( Aristotle. p. 4 ) . and populating in one is the lone possible natural result for worlds. However. the term citizen in Aristotle’s position would non hold applied to everyone. but it would hold been instead limited within the city state. The city state had been formed as a family. a partnership between â€Å"persons who can non be without one another† ( Aristotle. 1252a27 ) and had later developed into a community of families. small towns. the telos of which consequences in a concatenation of small towns. city state. It had come into being to prolong our basic demands and it had stayed in order to back up a better manner of life. The family is the chief construction in the city state. which in fact provides citizens with the chance to hone their human virtuousnesss. Not merely is the family a subsidiary to the political establishment. but besides within itself it is wholly formed by unequal relationships – natural swayer vs. natural slave. hubby vs. married woman. parent vs. kid. â€Å"The slave is entirely missing the deliberative component ; the female has it but it lacks authorization ; the kid has it but it is incomplete† ( 1260a11 ) . Womans had non been allowed to vote during Aristotle’s clip and as such their natural telos would hold been different from that of the work forces. Together with the natural slaves. they would hold in different ways from one another. provided the work forces with the needed basic necessities to prolong life and therefore hold more clip to accomplish their telos as a â€Å"political animal† ( Aristotle. p. 4 ) . However. natural slaves would hold had no rights in comparing to the adult females. since the thought of an enslaved individual means that they are of course missing the rational powers and practical ground and therefore ought to be enslaved in order for them to carry through their natural telos as supplying for the natural swayer and giving their lives to humble responsibilities ( Aristotle. p. 15 ) . Natural slaves are animals that are of course inferior to citizens. who would supply the citizens with adequate clip to heighten their lives and use themselves towards accomplishing their telos – political enrichment. The adult male of the family. the natural swayer. is in fact the citizen. person who â€Å"shares in disposal of justness and in offices† ( Aristotle. p. 66 ) . has the leisure clip to take part in the political life of the city state. In fact. the good life for a citizen. described with Aristotle’s thoughts. would hold focused on developing oneself as a â€Å"political animal† ( Aristotle. p. 4 ) . Supplying pecuniary supplies for the family by the agencies of utilizing the exchange value of the merchandises should be merely to prolong the basic necessities and fulfill human life. Luxuries points and manner of life did non quality as fulfilling of one’s telos in the head of Aristotle. In fact. people would neer be satisfied with what they have. since the demand for more would increase with the ownerships owned ( Aristotle. p. 17-20 ) . That is why the lone manner for people to accomplish their higher virtuousness would hold been through political relations and practical ground. It is merely natural to believe that. as Aristotle points out. because no other being posses the ability to ground. Therefore. it is the citizens’ chief end in life. to accomplish the natural telos. the good life. by heightening more upon his political engagement ( Aristotle. p. 3-5 ) . The natural slaves. nevertheless. can non accomplish any such telos due to their natural damage and lower status to the citizen. Their natural intent in life is to function the swayer and supply for them. since the natural slave deficiencies such capablenesss as ground. â€Å"For he is a slave by nature who is capable of belonging to another – which is besides why he belongs to another – and who participates in ground merely to the extent of comprehending it. but does non hold it† ( 1254b16-23 ) . Normally. as Aristotle points out. natural slaves bread other natural slaves. although. sometimes higher-ups are known to hold natural slaves every bit good. However. he struggles to find whether the natural slave is in fact wholly rationally impaired and upon what grounds he should be enslaved. Therefore. this creates troubles when seeking to distinguish who should be enslaved. why and how to separate between a natural slave and a natural swayer. Aristotle seems to believe that the undertaking of separating natural slaves is far easier than idea. since all people have a natural disposition to be best in a certain undertaking that may non ever be political relations. Therefore. he believes that non all people should take part in the kingdom of political relations. since they would profit more to society and themselves if they concentrate on their domain of cognition alternatively. Hobbes’ thoughts of the equality. inequality and the good life. differs enormously from Aristotle’s thought of natural slaves and natural telos for citizens in the political life. For Hobbes. nevertheless. the thought of equality applies to everyone in the physical sense of the word. He views human existences as equality vulnerable to decease or be killed. and every bit eager to find their desires and effort to accomplish them ( Hobbes. p. 169-170 ) . Through the survey of Epistemology. the cognition of what we know. which we get thought our sense feelings. and Metaphysics. the thought that the lone things that exists in the existence are material and have mass. Hobbes is able do picture a really clear image of what human existences are like and where their motives originate. For Hobbes. worlds are ‘desiring machines’ . who are driven by enterprises. internal motions or emotions. which drives the human being â€Å"toward something which causes it. is called APPETITE. or DESIRE†¦ when the enterprise is from ward something. it is by and large called AVERSION† ( Hobbes. p. 140 ) . For Aristotle. the good of any citizen would be to take part in the political life of the city state. whereas the immorality is seen as the extra desire towards geting more goods for pecuniary exchange. However. Hobbes disagrees and in fact Tells us that worlds are wanting machines. therefore motivated by their enterprises towards certain things. as such. â€Å"the object of any man’s appetency or desire. that is it which he for his portion calleth good: and the object of his hatred and antipathy. evil ; and his disdain. vile and inconsiderable† ( Hobbes. p. 141 ) . Such basic elements of emotions are described to be really visibly in the ‘state of nature’ . which Hobbes describes as neither historical nor realistically accurate topographic point. but instead logically accurate as it represents the construction and jobs from the nature of the human existences. a province of being outside any political system or authorization. In this province of nature. all individuals are physically and of course equal to each other. All human existences portion equal exposure to be killed and die. every bit good as equal hope to accomplish their ends or desires. Due to this equality. nevertheless. distrust rises between two parties in a state of affairs where they have a common desire for the same mercenary good. â€Å"if any two work forces desire the same thing. which however they can non both enjoy. they become enemies ; and in the manner to the terminal. ( which is chiefly their ain preservation. and sometimes their delight only. ) enterprise to destruct. or subdue one another† ( Hobbes. p. 170 ) . This leads to the province of war. which in no manner is merely described by conflicts and contending. but â€Å"in the known temperament thereto† ( Hobbes. p. 171 ) . Indifferent to the cause of war. which can be competitions. self-doubt or glorification: [ T ] here is no topographic point for industry†¦ no Culture of the Earth ; no Navigation†¦ no convenient Building ; no instruments of moving†¦ no Knowledge of the face of the Earth ; no history of Time ; no Arts ; no Letters ; no Society ; and which is worst of all. continual feare. danger of violent decease ; And the life of adult male. lone. poore. awful. brutish. and short ( Hobbes. p. 170-171. quotation mark as written from Sparksnotes. com ) . In Hobbes’ theory about the ‘state of nature’ . there is nil unfair. there are no societal contracts that can non be crossed because there is no higher power to implement any sort of penalty. It is in fact the fright of decease and desire to get more objects as to do life more comfy. which drives people to accomplish and seek peace. Humans’ are in fact bound by the Torahs of nature to prolong their lives. seek peace. contract by the manner of peace and maintain the compacts ( Hobbes. p. 172 ) . It is in their best involvement to remain alive and be provided with comfy lives. As such. people need Torahs. person to make them and person to implement them. The best result for Hobbes would be that all people give up their rights to a crowned head. higher power given to one individual who would maintain his topics alive and supply them with the basic necessities for life. Equally shortly as the autonomous sets in power. nevertheless. the equality equation alterations instantly. Whereas all worlds were to be equal to each other. they became topics to a superior swayer. whose regulation is to stay undisputed and undisturbed. as his chief intent is to set up and keep peace. Therefore. equality for Hobbes does non needfully intend political equality and rights for everyone. It merely represents the physical similarity among worlds to decease and be killed. and the equal right for everyone to take and accomplish a end. In fact. the good life for Hobbes. is within a province of inequality. under the regulation of crowned head. a higher power. which can prolong order and peace among the savage-like worlds. who are bound to mistrust and come in in the province of war. when there is no political authorization nowadays. Worlds are known to be ‘desiring machines’ . looking after their ain opportunism. fulfilling merely their ain enterprises. with a chief intent to keep their lives and prolong a comfy manner of life. Hobbes’ thought of equality is in fact more appealing than Aristotle’s hierarchal construction within the family and city state. Whereas Aristotle defines worlds are of course superior or inferior. Hobbes gives an equal start to everyone sing their physical exposure and ability to find their ain good and get it. In Hobbes’ version of equality. the topics of the crowned head do in fact give up a batch of their rights and free some autonomies. However. in the instance of a good crowned head their lives would be better off under a common regulation that will supply them with peace and the needed basic necessities. It would besides give them the excess room for chances and personal development. The good life for Hobbes is described by a set of people. peacefully connected within a society. ruled by a good crowned head. where all are sustained and provided for. Under an Aristotelean regulation. the topics would hold limited accomplishments that would hold been predestined base on their societal position. As Aristotle points out. natural slaves collapsible shelter to bread more natural slaves and therefore the rhythm of limited chances can non be broken. Merely citizens can take part in the political ream. although. even so some of them do non. Some have a limited ability to develop practical ground in comparing to some other domains that they might be more interested in. In other words. Aristotle’s. equality applies merely to those who experience some kind of political regulation. All others are at that place to supply them with the leisure clip and basic necessities to prolong life. Aristotle’s thought of a good life is available merely to the chosen few citizens who can take part in political relations. Everyone else experience a telos that is non as fulfilling. Aristotle’s thought of natural human telos. natural slave and natural swayer provides an penetration to the period of clip. during which he has lived. It is an thought of societal inequality that provides the good ‘ends’ merely to the few citizens who can accomplish it through their family and their practical logical thinking. The remainder of the members of that society are simply the suppliers and subsidiaries to the political kingdom. Hobbes’ theory on equality. nevertheless. provides all human existences with the same base – ‘We are all equal because we can all kill each other and we all want to find what is good for us. ‘ He gives humans the rubric of ‘desiring machines’ . which satisfy their ain demands and opportunisms. Because such behavior leads to war-like conditions. Hobbes believes that through fright of decease and desire of more ownerships. people would seek peace on their ain. and as a consequence subdue their rights to a crowned head. However. Hobbes’ apprehension of natural equality is preferred. as he provides society with the excess room for equality and chance that the topics of a good crowned head would see to be available to them. in comparing to Aristotle’s hierarchal division of people into natural higher-ups. inferiors and slaves. who are given really limited accomplishments and chances Hobbes. Thomas. Leviathan. Modern Political Thought – Readings from Machiavelli to Nietzsche. Ed. David Wooton. Hackett Publishing Company. Inc. : Indianapolis/Cambridge. 1996. Aristotle. The Politics. C. D. C. Reeve. Hackett Publishing Company. Inc. : Indianapolis/Cambridge.

The period of absolutism

The period of absolutism The period of absolutism refers to the exercise of monarchial power which was never questioned by other social institutions like the legislature and the church. The monarchs mainly reigned from the early period of the seventeenth century up to the end of the nineteenth century.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The period of absolutism specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Absolutism entailed ending the feudal partitioning, emergence of state power, harmonization of state laws, and there was also a decline in the power of the nobility. Many scholars contend that the French Revolution marked the end of the monarch in Europe or the early modern European period. This paper seeks to analyze the monarchy with specific reference to France and Mughal Empires respectively. The paper will explore the development of absolutism in each case after which there will be a conclusion to contrast the practice of absolutism in both cases. Th e exercise of absolute monarchy in the French territory began in the16th century, and it was preceded by the era of renaissance monarchy that was exercised on the basis of political consensus among the social classes and the monarch. France during the sixteenth century experienced numerous conflicts that occurred due to the establishment of Calvinism. During this period, French kings struggled to increase their power and this culminated to the rise of royal absolutism. In 1661 Louis XIV took over the French monarchy. He was in power from 1643 till 1715. During his reign, France became the most influential nation in the whole of Europe after supplanting Spain. The long reign of Louis XIV marked the pinnacle of royal absolutism, and he encouraged other monarchs to embrace his way of leadership. The beginning of French absolutism is associated with Henry IV’s reign. He ruled from 1589 to 1610. Before 1589, France had been plagued by a series of religious conflicts especially bet ween the Catholics and their Protestant counterparts. Other political factions also engaged in these wars. These wars greatly affected the stability of France. Therefore, when Henry started exercising his authority, he was determined to end the chaos and restore stability in France. In this regard, Henry IV formulated new plans that would foster social economic prosperity. He also made arrangements on how to secure France from external aggression. Nonetheless, he was assassinated in 1610 when he was planning to attack his rivals.Advertising Looking for essay on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Marie de Medicos’, who was Henry IV’s wife reigned for several years as a regent for Louis XIII who was then their young son. Marie was able to challenge her opponents, but she did very little to strengthen the monarchy. In 1624, Cardinal Richelieu was appointed chief minister and he soon begun wielding hi s authority behind the throne. He had a twofold plan for developing a supreme royal power and also to make France occupy a dominant position in Europe. With his full control of the royal army, he destroyed all the king’s opponents. In order to destabilize local units of political authority, Richelieu came up with thirty administrative districts and each was ruled by an authoritative intend ant that was answerable to the throne. Finally, he subjected France to thirty years of conflict with Germany. In this case, he aimed at weakening Habsburg. Richelieu managed to have a firm grip on the royal power by 1642 when he died. Besides this, he managed to fulfill his dream of elevating France to a dominant position in Europe. Cardinal Jules Mazarin succeeded Richelieu. In order to elevate his status, Louis XIV introduced several construction projects that led to the popularity of his government. His new palace was one of his greatest architectural projects. In 1682, he relocated to V ersailles. Initially, it was not easy to exercise absolutism monarchy in France due to the following reasons. First, the nobles had the chance to build private armies and fortifications. Secondly, lesser kings who were literate had the chance to become agents of the king. They dispensed justice and collected taxes on behalf of the king, and this gave them some authority. In order to consolidate his power, Louis XIV employed the following strategies in his administration. He limited the authority of the nobles by ensuring that they at least stayed in Versailles for a period of time annually. He used this as a strategy to closely monitor the nobles so that they could not conspire to topple him. In addition to this, he also abolished Protestantism.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The period of absolutism specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This led to the migration of Protestants to other places which still allowed the pr actice of Protestantism. As they migrated, they spread their civilization in other territories. Louis XIV was also determined to expand his frontiers in Europe. Absolutism became very strong during the reign of Louis XIV. The Mughal Empire occupied a dominant position in India from the second phase of the 16th century until the first half of the 18th century. It was established from 1526 and it survived up to 1858, when the British Raj supplanted it. â€Å"While many monarchs strived to centralize their powers, authoritative rulers emerged in Asian territories†. With time, the emperors became stable enough to challenge western powers. Even though the Mughals never focused much on international trade, they however allowed business revenue into their treasuries. Mughal Empire reached its height during Aurangzeb’s leadership. Following his death in 1707, his regime was weakened by a series of several military campaigns, corruption, and killing of the Hindus. â€Å"As the Mughal Empire disintegrated his rivals quickly took over power and by mid 18th century, the land controlled by Aurangzeb’s successors had dwindled to Delhi†. The Mughal Empire had remarkable contributions in art and architecture. From the above discussion on the Empire of France and Mughal, it can be concluded that that they were both ruled by authoritative kings who were mainly concerned with consolidating their power and influence over their subjects. These two societies were both stratified with the nobles occupying the administrative positions. Most of the kings in France were keen on expanding their territories, and this always subjected them into a series of military campaigns with their neighboring countries. However, the Mughal Empire under the governance of Aurangzeb was not keen on territorial expansion as compared to France under the rule of Louis XIV.Advertising Looking for essay on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Even though absolute monarchy existed in France and Mughal Empires, it was more entrenched in the former than in the latter. â€Å"The end of the early modern is usually also associated with the industrial revolution which began in Britain in the mid 18th century†. The history of the early modern period as a whole therefore enables us to have a better understanding of the social and political developments of various European societies. Cameron, Euan. Early Modern Europe: An Oxford History. London: Oxford University Press, 1999. Sherman, Dennis and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World, Volume II: From 1600. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2010.

Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words - 3

Human Rights - Essay Example Further, Section 3, sub section 2, delineated that the validity of this provision of legislation applies to such kind of primary legislation, which could be state courts of member countries, but in no way, could impinges upon enforcement and operation ability of existing laws, that are not in consistency with laws of the ECHR, or in the enforcement of inconsistent lower legislation, should the primary legislation not be competent enough, to take cognisance of such secondary legislation enforcement. Thus effectively, it is seen that apropos HRA 1998, British Courts are themselves required to act compatibly with the Convention, thus putting broader responsibility on them to incorporate and apply the Convention and its elucidation by the European Court of Human Rights. UK courts are also privileged to amend specific provisions of UK laws to make them in line with European Convention, provided it does not disagree with the express intentions of UK Parliament.  2 The main idea behind this however, is that that secondary laws in countries could still co-exist, independent of the fact that ECHR laws are inconsistent with them, or cannot be enforced in certain contexts. 3 Normally it is seen that in case of European Convention laws clashing with State or domestic laws, it is necessary for local laws to be amended in order to provide for implementation of EC laws and conventions. But perhaps this is not applicable in the case of ECHR laws which deal with Human rights. But in the cases of ECHR, it is believed that the verdicts of national courts determine internal laws, and it is to these decisions that law of precedents need to be applied. Therefore, the application of European laws needs to respect the framework of domestic and local laws in its installation and enforcement of diktats. 4 The ECHR broadly lays down the various articles that underpin the enforcement of various human right laws in the United Kingdoms and

The more advances that are made in Medicine, the more things stay the Scholarship Essay - 1

The more advances that are made in Medicine, the more things stay the same. Discuss - Scholarship Essay Example This paper argues out this concept by giving the several impacts of the advancement of medicine on patients in the society. This will create the basis of the argument to verify its credibility. The paper will analyze both the positive and negative effects of advancement of medicine in the society today by looking at various situational cases where advanced medical services are used. The results of the use of advanced medical services lay the foundation of this argument considering its positivity and negativities. Because of the availability of medical equipment for research and treatment, researchers in the field of medicine have come up with different kinds of medicines which cure various diseases (Alyson, 2014). They have also been able to study complicated diseases in the recent years and have found the cure for some chronic diseases. Biotechnology is a great advancement in the field of medicine making it easy for people to live with chronic diseases. It prolongs the life of people suffering from serious and chronic illnesses by controlling of diseases or the virus in the body of patients. An example is dealing with patients suffering from cancer. Biotechnology has given hope to such patients by controlling the disease through chemotherapy hence prolonging their life span. The use of plastic body parts has also helped individuals to live a normal life (Catalunya, 2014). An example is patients suffering from breast cancer and has lost a part of her breast. Plastic breasts can be used to al low her live a normal life like any other woman. The advancement of medicine in the world today is due to the evolvement of technology as it improves to make solving problems today an easy task. There are various advancements in medicine today and a majority of them are influenced by the availability of advanced technology in the health sector. Medical advancements are aimed at

Chinese Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Chinese - Movie Review Example He is a son to one of the local rich in the area. His father is also a compulsive gambler, and lost his family property to Long’er who is also a gambler. Fugui’s behaviors and characters also make Jiazhen, his long suffering wife to leave him, together with their daughter and unborn son. This paper will look into succinct analysis of the movie, considering the political aspect depicted in the film, for instance, war in China (Yimou). Chinese civil war takes place and Chunsheng and Fugui get conscription into Kuomingtang during one of the performances. He leaves his family behind and his only daughter becomes dumb due cold fever when he is away. From this, it is evident that conscription into the military or any other related activity in China was a mandatory during the time the film was shot. It is also evident in the Chinese society that rich people are considered anti-revolutionary and executed. An example is the murder of Long’er who had just acquired his wealth through gambling with Fugui. The government also claims unlawful possession of individual wealth. When Long’er shows his unwillingness to donate his wealth to the public, he is considered an enemy to revolution and is executed immediately(Yimou). War between China and Taiwan is also depicted in the film. The local chiefs are charged with a responsibility of informing the people to collect all their iron materials for refinement and manufacture of steel weapons for fighting the Taiwanese. This is a depiction of long time rift and disagreement between the two Asian nations. Another aspect of political dominion, in China, during the 1994 is that of strictness in the education policies. Youking is killed because of not getting up early for school. The government blindly believes that it is only through education that revolution can be achieved in China. Cogently reasoning, it is quite illogical imprudent to terminate the life of a young